NLP Training does not work

By NLP Courses, NLP Products, NLP Training 4 Comments 22nd February 2012

  • Tweet
  • Tweet

I admit this is a contentious title but I would suggest that unless you put certain conditions in place training generally doesn’t work and NLP training specifically doesn’t work. In this article I will explain why I am making that claim and some of the simple things you can do to make your learning effective.

A Systems Approach to Training

Shortly after the second world war the USA Air Force placed a lot of research into staff training this was from fighter pilots, through cooks, managers and front line troops. They rapidly found out that they were spending a huge amount of time, effort and money on training. But the scary part was, when they went into the work place to look at the results of the training they were finding little or no impact based on the amount of effort put into the training.

Out of this mire the US Airforce, aided by some great names in training like Skinner (the father of behaviourism and the guy for NLP anchoring before anyone called it anchoring.) and Benjamin Bloom (rarely mentioned in NLP circles but is a lynch pin for the structure of training) designed a new approach to training design called a Systems Approach to Training.

A Process of Training Development

Like all great ideas a Systems Approach to Training (SAT) is a statement of the startlingly obvious once someone has told you it. There is a lot said about this on the internet so I am just going to give you my version. So here is my taxonomy of training design:

  • Explore the need
  • Develop and deliver the course
  • Integrating material back into your life
  • Evaluation
  • Redesign

Let’s just break down a couple of these points down and look at the implications.

Before I will go on a course I want to match my needs against the course content and work out if I will get what I need from the course. I also like looking out to the future and imagining these four questions:

  1. The negative consequences of not attending the course
  2. The positive consequences of attending the course
  3. The negative consequences of attending the course
  4. The positive consequences of not attending the course

The answers to these four questions will give me the whole picture as to the value of the course. When I am designing courses I imagine my ideal student and take them through exactly the same four questions. Incidentally if you are a NLP Jargon Junkie these questions are developed through Cartesian logic and are usually packaged up at a really high price under the name quantum linguistic.

By taking this approach you are setting the conditions for attending the course and getting the most for it as well as building the criteria for evaluating the course. In fact I would encourage you to do a pre-evaluation which would be about looking out into the future and seeing what has changed for you, the people around you and your wider environment as a result of this course. This just gives you more criteria to evaluate from.

You might already have realised that going through this process is preframing your experience of the course. It sets out your motivation, the filters on how you see the course content, how you go through exercises and pretty much every aspect of how you interact with the course material. And I suspect you can recognise this will make the difference between going on a course and going on a life changing event that truly gives you a quantum leap change. Bearing that in mind it really surprises me how few personal development trainers support their prospects in this before signing them up for a course.

Integrating the Course Content into Your Life

Starting with the USAAF there has been a lot of research done on how people change at the end of a training course. The sad fact is that many people at the end of a course go back to their normal routines and the new learning is lost.

What the USAAF found was that routine coaching sessions based on setting goals about integrating the course material over a period of time made a significant difference to the retention and usefulness of the course material. The reality is if you want to get the most out of your course regular and routine coaching sessions to supplement the training are key.

A New Model of Personal Development Training

If you have been reading my articles for any length of time you will already have heard about Tom Vizzini and Kim McFarland. If you have read the Persuasion Skills Black Book you know they feature in it. They have put together a course that combines powerful personal influence tools as well some great personal development tools. But the issue is not the course content but the incredible way they have structured the course for you to get the best from it. Click through and have a look here.

 

  •  
  •  
  •  

Tags: ,

If you enjoyed this article Sign Up Today and get email updates! (it's free).

  • http://www.KnowTis.ca Mazen Alzogbi

    I have attended several coaching and NLP trainings/schools. The knowledge that I have integrated quickly and deeply was in schools which provided a periodical coaching model attached to the training. I appreciate this post immensely as I start my own NLP models school.

    Thanks Rintu. Your work is much appreciated.

    • http://www.theNLPcompany.com Rintu Basu

      Brilliant Mazen, I wish you well as you quite clear get the idea. Let me know how you get on.

      Cheers

      Rintu

      • http://www.achieveawarenesshypnosis/ Jackie

        Interesting article. There is always something new to learn.
        Thank You for all your good work.

        • http://www.theNLPcompany.com Rintu Basu

          Thanks for saying Jackie.

          Cheers

          R


Tweet